Maps, Directions, and Place Reviews
Older comments
I have no idea why this text was banned. I am in the HRIS business and quickly wrote the ATS description without referring to any outside materials. The page this is linking to as claiming infringement I've never seen before in my life. Any relation to that source was coincidental.
Can someone help me out here? I added a link to our system on this page and my change was reverted. This is my first post on Wikipedia. Did I do something wrong? Thanks! I appreciate the help. The link was to ForumJobs which is a company that provides an Applicant Tracking System, much like all the other external links on the page. --Jenoverholt 23:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
I found locating CATS difficult, so I changed the title of CATS to make it easier to google search something relevant to it. Edit: 2nd thought, calling it CATS Applicant Tracking System seems recursive and overemphasized. Is there any way we can make this slightly more searchable? Perhaps CATS needs its own wikipedia page?
Cats Applicant Tracking Video
CATS should be removed
Although the software is open source, the hosting company is profiting from the referrals. It seems that this link clearly violates the advertising policy.
Drasticp 21:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)drasticp
CATS should be added
The Open Source project has now separated from the company who offered CATS SaaS. --Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.212.29.67 (talk) 12:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Some suggested edits
This is Jacob Gordon, Media and Communications Officer at JobDiva, an Applicant Tracking System. I've been attempting make some edits to the Applicant tracking system Wikipedia page. I'd like to more fully explain the nature of the edits I've been trying to make.
JobDiva is the only ATS on the market that filters candidates by years of experience based on the resume. Therefore, the following statement in the Wikipedia page -- "In many cases they filter applications automatically based on given criteria such as keywords, skills, former employers, years of experience and schools attended. This has caused many to adapt resume optimization techniques similar to those used in search engine optimization when creating and formatting their résumé" - is potentially misleading. The proximity of the terms "in many cases," "years of experience," "skills," and "resumes" could easily lead the reader to the false conclusion that this filtering ability is shared by many ATSs.
In my attempted edits thus far, I've backed up JobDiva's claim to be the only ATS to filter candidates in this manner with references to JobDiva patents as they are listed on the US Patent Office website. The response I received suggested that I would have to find a reliable source other than the patent office in order to bolster these claims. If I interpret this response correctly, it suggests that other organizations may be using this filtering ability even though we hold patents on it - that is, they are engaging in patent infringement. We've gone to court to protect our patents in the past, and I can assure you that if anyone were infringing on our patents, we would be suing them as we speak. We are not aware of any infringement currently taking place. If anyone is aware of any such infringement, please bring it to our attention - you are a witness to a violation of the law.
Finally, I am puzzled by the rejection of the Patent Office references when some of the references currently on this page seem dubious. The page's first reference, for example, is a link to SmartRecruiters' home page; it is used to back up the article's claim that "an ATS is very similar to customer relationship management systems." Yet the SmartRecruiters home page says nothing about the similarities between ATSs and CRMs. Similarly, the fifth reference bolsters the claim that "the majority of job and resume boards have partnerships with ATS software providers to provide parsing support and ease of data migration from one system to another." Yet the reference is simply a link to Monster.com's About page, which says nothing at all about ATSs. It seems to me that our proposed Patent Office references are more solid and reliable than some of the references currently on the page. -- Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobg898 (talk o contribs) 21:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for this reply. However, I remain unpersuaded. It seems to me that the US Patent Office qualifies as a third-party source, and a reliable one at that -- would the US Patent Office website publish false information? A primary source, in this case, would be a reference to our patents on the JobDiva website itself. I'd also reiterate my earlier point about our proposed patent office references being more reliable than several of the references currently on the page.Jacobg898 (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Only benefits?
This article is inbalanced, as it only mentions benefits, but no disadvantages. Best regads.--91.67.145.42 (talk) 08:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Source of the article : Wikipedia
EmoticonEmoticon